Saturday, January 25, 2014
Why is Propane Price Higher?
The short answer is that we have had a lot of cold weather, and supplies are falling short of demand. A more complete answer is that we went into winter this year with much lower stocks of propane than usual-- because more had already been used up for grain drying than usual. This was true because, since the corn had been planted late, the point in the life cycle of the plants where the grain is ripe and the plant starts to dry down did not occur until well after the hot, dry days of late summer were past. The reason that the corn had been planted late is that in 2013, we had a very, very wet spring. So, a wet spring one year equals high propane price the following winter. For a better perspective , see The Cat's earlier post: Do We Eat Petroleum?
Thursday, January 16, 2014
Agreement About Inequality
There was an interesting article in the Jan 15, 2014 issue of the Wall Street Journal, by Wm. A. Galston entitled "Where right and Left Agree on Inequality. I read the news pages of WSJ, but I usually don't bother with the editorial section. Whereas the news pages still contain useful information about the price and availability of strategic things like oil, corn, and copper, the editorial section is generally a wellspring of pompous, ultra-right-wing nonsense---a sort of "Fox News for the materially blessed." When you do find something worth reading there, it is usually a guest opinion by some famous person responding to some outrage which WSJ printed a few days before. But every once and a while, a article appears there that actually makes sense.
Whether you consider yourself, left-wing, right-wing, or something else, you should read this brief article, if you are concerned about inequality. If you are not concerned about inequality, then you are an idiot, because besides being a moral outrage, inequality is bad for business. The World Bank now says that the principle reason for the sluggish recovery is inequality. Put simply, sales are slow because though there is a lot of cash in the economy, the people who need to buy anything are not the people who have any of it.
Whether you consider yourself, left-wing, right-wing, or something else, you should read this brief article, if you are concerned about inequality. If you are not concerned about inequality, then you are an idiot, because besides being a moral outrage, inequality is bad for business. The World Bank now says that the principle reason for the sluggish recovery is inequality. Put simply, sales are slow because though there is a lot of cash in the economy, the people who need to buy anything are not the people who have any of it.
Friday, December 13, 2013
Was 2013 the Best Year in Human History?
Actually, in most ways it was. Here are some numbers which show that although the planet is over-populated, running out of resources, and facing climate change, we humans are also less impoverished,
healthier, longer lived, better educated, and less violent than at any time in history. Check it out:
healthier, longer lived, better educated, and less violent than at any time in history. Check it out:
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Foggy Here Today
Santa shouted in despair,
"It's all IFR out there."
I'll call Rudolf, The Red-nosed Raindeer,
Or Pat, The Pink-nosed Bat.
Either can guide me safely,
Or I'll stay right where I'm at.
"It's all IFR out there."
I'll call Rudolf, The Red-nosed Raindeer,
Or Pat, The Pink-nosed Bat.
Either can guide me safely,
Or I'll stay right where I'm at.
Sunday, December 1, 2013
Warm Winter Day.
When you get a warm, sunny day in December, it's like getting a text message from Persephone---Not quite a visit, but more than a hello.
Saturday, November 16, 2013
Income Inequality Worries Wall Street
According to an article by Justin Lahart in the Nov 11, 2013 Wall Street Journal entitled "Worry Over Inequality Occupies Wall Street," Hedge fund managers are beginning to worry about the rising level of income equality in the United States. Since they are on the receiving end of this outrageous unfairness, why should they be concerned? They are concerned because the last year that inequality reached the present level was 1928---just a year before the crash that triggered the Great Depression. When inequality reaches a certain point, the system breaks down and becomes unstable. But any remedy to this instability would involve raising working class wages, and raising taxes on the rich. But low wages and taxes are the main reason that wealthy investors are making their present rip-off profits. So any action to avert a financial disaster in the long term would require the super rich to give up money in the short term. And no matter how worried they get, they probably won't do that.
There is a short story called "The Monkey's Paw" which begins with an anecdote about monkey trapping. According to the story, monkeys are sometime trapped by hollowing out a coconut and boring only one small hole in it. The hole is just large enough so that the monkey can just barely put his hand through it if the palm is open. But if he is grasping something is his fist, it won't fit through the hole. They chain the coconut in place and place a piece of fruit inside it. The monkey smells the fruit and puts his hand in and grabs it, but then he can't get his hand back out. He could easily extract his hand if he dropped the fruit--but he won't ever do that. Even as the hunter approaches to seize him, he cannot let go of the fruit once he has it in his hand---he is hard-wired to keep it. I suspect that the hedge fund managers have the same problem.
There is a short story called "The Monkey's Paw" which begins with an anecdote about monkey trapping. According to the story, monkeys are sometime trapped by hollowing out a coconut and boring only one small hole in it. The hole is just large enough so that the monkey can just barely put his hand through it if the palm is open. But if he is grasping something is his fist, it won't fit through the hole. They chain the coconut in place and place a piece of fruit inside it. The monkey smells the fruit and puts his hand in and grabs it, but then he can't get his hand back out. He could easily extract his hand if he dropped the fruit--but he won't ever do that. Even as the hunter approaches to seize him, he cannot let go of the fruit once he has it in his hand---he is hard-wired to keep it. I suspect that the hedge fund managers have the same problem.
Saturday, November 2, 2013
Do We Eat Petroleum?
Actually,
that's what we mostly eat nowadays. A chemical analysis would not show the presence of
petroleum in anything you usually eat, but in a sense, you are eating it. Your food comes from a machine
that turns oil into food. If
I could show you a black box, made such that people were pouring oil into one
end, turning the crank, and food was coming out the other, would you then agree
that we turn oil into food? After
seeing such a machine, you might say, "Let's test it. Stop putting oil into it." So
the man stops putting oil into the machine, but continues turning the crank. And before long, food stops coming out.
At that point, you would concede, "Well, I guess it turns oil into
food." Do we have such
a machine?
Actually,
we do. It's the largest machine in
the world, and almost all of our food comes from this machine. The entire food production,
processing, and distribution infrastructure of the civilized world can be
considered a single, huge machine, and into it we feed a large percentage of
all the oil produced in the world. And most of the world's seven plus billion inhabitants
consume commodities disgorged from
this device. We who live in the developed countries consume almost nothing
else. Without it we would
all starve. But petroleum is a
finite resource and will eventually be gone. We don't know just when, but the
point of peak global production is already behind us. We have already quit using oil for some of the things
we used it for 40 years ago. So--how
will we eat when it's gone? That's
a good question and perhaps it is time we began thinking about it.
We
got a good wakeup call just this weekend.
All of the papers carried a piece about the delayed corn harvest. This is the kind of headline that scares
the hell out of anyone who understands the food supply. Corn is the starting point for almost
everything we eat---everything from pork chops to cooking oil to bourbon
whisky---it all comes from corn. We had a record corn crop this year, but
half of it is still in the field, and no one is straining to get it out. Why? In order to be stored in a bin, the moisture content
of corn cannot exceed 15%. But
this year, we had an unusually rainy spring, and planting was delayed almost a
month all across the corn belt. We
still got a large crop, but the point in the life cycle of the plant where the
seed is set and starts drying down occurred a month late---well after the hot,
dry, sunny weather of late summer was past. The corn now standing in the field has a moisture content of
19% to 24%, and before it can be put in a bin, it must be artificially dried. Most farmers have the grain dryers to do this, but this year, they cannot obtain the propane to operate
them. The reason that we now have
a shortage of propane is due to the unusually large amount of grain drying that
has already taken place---yet half of the crop is still in the field. Even when propane supplies are
available, every wet autumn we must decide whether to let half the crop rot or
buy absolutely massive amounts of petroleum to dry it. And when we decide to buy the propane and save the crop, which we always do, we
are turning oil into food. But
what happens when the petroleum isn't there to buy?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)